Case studyManufacturing9 min read

SpinTrack: bringing lot-level quality tracking to a spinning mill that sold yarn by reputation

A cotton spinning mill had built its name on consistent yarn, but quality records lived in lab registers and production numbers in shift logs. When a buyer complained, tracing a lot back to its cotton bales took days. We built SpinTrack: bale-to-cone traceability, lab test capture, machine-wise production tracking, quality alerts and buyer certificates.

19
Features shipped
4
Apps & platforms
6
Team members
18
Weeks to rollout
SpinTrack lot traceability on a mill floor
SpinTrack: from bale to cone, every lot traceable.
01

A buyer's complaint and three days of searching

SpinTrack's managing director told us about a buyer who reported uneven yarn in one consignment. Finding which lot, which ring frames and which cotton bales it came from took the quality team three days of registers and memory. The mill's reputation was built on consistency; its records could not prove it.

“We sell trust by the kilo. We need to be able to prove it.”

— SpinTrack's managing director
02

Walking the process

We walked the process from bale store to packing. Bales were mixed by recipe, processed through carding, drawing, combing and ring spinning, then wound and packed. Lab tests happened at several stages, recorded in registers. Machine output was logged per shift by hand.

Gaps in the record
  • Mixing recipes not linked to output lots
  • Lab results in registers, not searchable
  • Machine output recorded by hand per shift
  • No early warning when quality drifted
Industrial robotic arm
From bale store to packing, with registers at every step.
03

Bale to cone

SpinTrack gives bales, mixings and yarn lots barcode identities and records which lots passed through which machines. Lab instruments' results are imported directly and linked to lots. When a test drifts towards its limit, supervisors are alerted before a whole lot goes out of specification.

For buyers, each consignment carries a quality certificate generated from the actual test data, with traceability available on request.

04

The team

Lab instrument integration and floor usability drove the staffing.

1
Engagement lead

Mill walkthroughs and rollout.

1
Product designer

Floor tablets and quality dashboards.

2
Full-stack engineers

Traceability, production and certificates.

1
Integration engineer

Lab instruments and barcode printing.

1
Data scientist

Quality drift detection.

6 people in total, working as one team.

05

Decisions we made

Agreed with the managing director and quality manager.

01

Manual entry or instrument import?

  • Type lab results
  • Import directly from instruments

Our call: Import directly from instruments. Direct import removed transcription errors and saved lab time.

02

Traceability granularity?

  • By day
  • By lot and machine

Our call: By lot and machine. Lot-and-machine tracing let the mill isolate problems precisely.

03

Cloud or on-premise?

  • Cloud only
  • On-premise with cloud sync

Our call: On-premise with cloud sync. The floor must work during outages; management needed remote access.

06

Every feature, module by module

Everything that shipped for the floor, the lab, management and buyers.

Traceability
Bale to cone.
  • 01Bale inventory

    Bales with origin and fibre properties.

  • 02Mixing recipes

    Recipes linked to output lots.

  • 03Lot barcodes

    Lots identified through every process.

  • 04Machine routing

    Which machines processed each lot.

  • 05Trace search

    Any lot traced in seconds.

Quality
Proof of consistency.
  • 06Lab instrument import

    Test results imported directly.

  • 07Specifications by count

    Limits per yarn count.

  • 08Drift alerts

    Warnings before limits are breached.

  • 09Control charts

    Trends by machine and shift.

  • 10Non-conformance records

    Issues with actions.

Production
Output you can trust.
  • 11Machine-wise production

    Output per machine and shift.

  • 12Efficiency tracking

    Production against targets.

  • 13Shop-floor tablets

    Entries and alerts on the floor.

  • 14Waste tracking

    Waste by process.

Buyers and management
Trust, documented.
  • 15Quality certificates

    Generated from real test data.

  • 16Buyer portal

    Certificates and traceability on request.

  • 17Management dashboard

    Production, quality and waste.

  • 18Role-based access

    Floor, lab, managers and buyers.

  • 19Audit trail

    Every record change logged.

SpinTrack quality trend charts
Quality trends with control limits, per count and machine.
07

Rollout

We started with one yarn count on a subset of machines, then extended across the mill. The next buyer query was answered in minutes, with lot history and test results attached.

  1. Weeks 1–2
    Discovery

    Process walked from bale store to packing.

  2. Weeks 3–4
    Design

    Traceability model and floor screens.

  3. Weeks 5–13
    Build

    Traceability, quality, production and certificates.

  4. Weeks 14–16
    Pilot

    One count on a subset of machines.

  5. Weeks 17–18
    Full mill

    All counts and machines.

08

What we learned

Traceability is a sales asset. Buyers valued certificates backed by real data.

Catch drift, not just failures. Alerts near limits prevented bad lots.

Built with
  • Next.js
  • React Native
  • NestJS
  • PostgreSQL
  • Lab instrument data import
  • Barcode lot tracking
  • Quality anomaly detection
  • On-premise server with cloud sync
CTA Background

Building something like SpinTrack?

Bring the problem as it actually is, constraints included. You will get a straight answer on whether we are the right team.

View Our Work
AI-First Engineering
Secure & Scalable
Built to Deliver Impact
More case studies